Is Rejoicing over the Death of Extremists Okay?
![]() |
| Image from the front page of the New York Times |
Now, the question we need to ask ourselves is whether it is justifiable to rejoice in the death of these religious scholars who might have been wicked in thought and behavior. It is a difficult question that poses an ethical dilemma for us and our core values. I personally don't see these people as applicable, but that doesn't mean they deserve death. They might not be very useful, but it is unfair to assume their presence in society is baleful. They are not physicians to prevent and cure disease, they are not engineers to build roads and buildings; they are rather experts in one thing: how to contaminate the minds of people through Islamic teachings. But still that is neither convincing nor reasonable for us to conclude that it is fine to celebrate the death of a wicked. One thing we can do instead of celebrating their death is to reflect on their actions and responsibilities.
For the past 17 years, every time a suicide attack ripped through a crowd of civilians, killing dozens and leaving hundreds wounded, these religious scholars failed to condemn the attacks. Their silence would mean they are tacitly approving of the suicide attacks. Until now, they have been spectators; they may not have felt the pain and suffering of others, but now they should. Though this does not mean we should be happy over their death despite their evil-mindedness. Wishing their demise or rejoicing over their death itself indicates a malevolent nature. Ultimately, it shows our weakness and our willingness to submit to bigotry and hatred, which is nothing different from what fanatic Islamists do. But there is a better way to defeat them, and that's not through lowering ourselves to their standard. We can defeat these evil-minded and religious bigots by reasoning and challenging their stone-age beliefs and by teaching them modern values.
