You can’t fake your way into parliament

Afghans, and more precisely, in this case, Pashtuns, are now rallying to support Zahid Safi. His campaign has already taken a hit: the manager has stepped down following backlash over offensive online remarks, and notably, there’s no Australian presence within Safi's team. In Bruce, the Safi clan, a large network of families sharing the same last names, has stepped in. Wearing matching blue, round-necked T-shirts and covering their paunches with bold “SAFI” lettering, they pose with forced smiles for the cameras.

It may look like a campaign gaining momentum, but beyond appearances, what’s missing is substance, brain power, integrity, and a genuine understanding of basic responsibilities, such as not lying, not discriminating against people based on their ethnicity or race. Someone should tell this guy to go to the community and apologize for your blatant racism and take down the submission. Learn some decency. Someone needs to say it plainly: dude, you can't fake your way into parliament. This isn't Afghanistan. Your fakery for all sorts of glorification is obsolete here. 

Fake it to break it: The Zahid Safi Liberal Candidate Debacle

In my previous post, I wrote: “The rotten stench is rising from the corpse of the Australian Liberal Party’s pitch for the division of Bruce in the upcoming federal election.” There was a reason for that choice of words.

The Liberal candidate, Zahid Safi, has now been revealed as a university dropout. It reminds me of George Santos, who successfully made his debut in the US Congress for a brief period but was recently sentenced to seven years in a New York federal court for a slew of deceptions.

So how did someone like Zahid slip into the ranks of the Liberal Party? The answer is clear: fake it to make it but now, it ironically translates as fake it to break it. The candidate has become a laughingstock. Touted as a wildly successful businessman, Safi’s record tells a very different story: businesses that were de-registered because of being unable to pay the fees, listed under a fake address, peppered with phony reviews, and littered with stock images.

The most successful part in his life, I would say, is his ability to successfully beguile the liberal party leadership. "It's not that difficult. You say a bunch of impressive lies and they believe you since they don't know about your background," a friend told me, who we both wondered about that simple question mentioned earlier.

But here’s the most damning development: as Australia approaches the election on May 3rd, Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has already distanced himself from Zahid Safi. It shows that he is clearly wary of further damage to the party’s credibility, and he should be. As Ronald Mizen reports in The Australian Financial Review:

 "When Coalition sources outlined the seats that Dutton would visit in the final week of the campaign in his 28-seat blitz, Bruce was absent. This could be because it was impractical to list all 28, or it could be because standing up next to Safi and peppered with questions about his past is not the kind of television the Liberals want in the final week of the campaign."

In a Facebook Reel video, journalists from The Age confront Zahid Safi with questions, but he flees the scene. He is caught shortly after, as he gets into a car sitting on the driver's side and attempts to close the door to prevent journalists from asking him questions. When pressed, he struggles to answer even the most basic questions. His response to nearly every question, regardless of the topic, is simply: “the cost of living.” When asked about the fake reviews and false address tied to his and his wife’s business, his answer is still: “the cost of living.”

The revelation that Senator Jana Stewart has submitted a letter to the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) regulatory agency, calling for a formal investigation, is a strong and necessary step toward accountability.

The Business of Deception: Zahid Safi and the Liberal Party's Rotten Pitch

The rotten stench is rising from the corpse of the Australian Liberal Party’s pitch for the division of Bruce for the upcoming federal election. In a recent exposé for The Age, journalist Charlotte Grieve uncovers a disturbing truth: Zahi Safi, the man being paraded as a "successful businessman" by the party, is little more than a fraud. Many of Safi’s businesses appear to exist only on paper, at best.

Take Willow Support Services, an NDIS provider supposedly owned by Safi. When Grieve visited its listed address, she found not an office or facility, but a private residence. It gets worse: multiple Safi-affiliated businesses have been deregistered since March for failing to pay basic fees. His websites are padded with fake reviews, featuring photos recycled across countless unrelated pages. The so-called reviewers? Their LinkedIn profiles list them as being overseas and spread across hundreds of pages on the web.

Faced with this mountain of fakery, Grieve wonders the obvious: "My detailed questions included whether the Liberal Party was satisfied that Safi’s businesses were legitimate, why stock images, fake reviews, and outdated addresses had been used, and whether this raised any concerns for the party."

The appalling part is the response from the party's spokesperson in response to Charlotte Grieve's concerns:

“The Liberal Party is very proud to support a candidate whose family fled the violent conflict in Afghanistan and chose to make Australia his home. Like many people in the electorate of Bruce, Zahid runs his own small business while raising a family. Like many small business owners, Zahid acknowledges that his administrative paperwork isn’t always up to date and has taken steps with his accountant to rectify.”

It appears the Liberal Party is willfully ignoring both the glaring evidence of fraud surrounding its candidate, Zahid Safi, and the growing outrage from members of the Hazara community in Bruce. Community organizers and members have repeatedly called on the party to disendorse Safi, citing his 2021 parliamentary submission, in which he openly vilified Hazara Australians in a display many have condemned as racist.

The Afghans Who Bring the Persecution of Hazaras to Australia

Here are the six individuals, along with some background, who co-authored the 2021 parliamentary submission (see page 3, document number 43) targeting the Hazara community—an inquiry widely criticized for its blatant racism, distortions, and falsehoods.

The submission resurfaced recently after The Guardian Australia revealed that one of its authors is none other than Atal Zahid Safi, also known as Zahid Safi, the current Liberal candidate for Bruce, an electorate with one of Australia's largest Hazara populations. The irony is hard to miss.

In their submission, the authors attempt to frame Hazaras as a national security threat to Australia (see page 14). At one point, they even write: “The Australian Government should work closely with key stakeholders from the Afghan Diaspora, including the authors of these submissions.” In other words, they’re positioning themselves as the authoritative voices of the community, people to be consulted, reconciled with, and trusted. The implications are as concerning as they are revealing.

1) Atal Zahid Safi

At the center of this controversy is Atal Zahid Safi, one of the authors of a 2021 parliamentary submission that vilified the Hazara community in Australia. When you read his biography and then look at his actions, you’re left asking: What exactly is going on in this man’s mind?

Safi, born in 1987 in Laghman Province, Afghanistan, was an infant when his family fled to Pakistan. He spent his formative years there, growing up far removed from the lived realities of Afghanistan. At 16, he and his family sought asylum in Finland, where he learned Finnish, attended university, and built a life. A decade later, in 2013, he moved to Australia. He married a woman named Zinab Husseinkhil, and they have six children together. Fast forward to 2021, and Safi co-authored a submission to the Australian Parliament, an appalling document that paints Hazaras as a national security threat. In it, the authors claim Hazaras have never been persecuted in Afghanistan, dismissing years of documented violence, systemic discrimination, and the ongoing genocide against them. They had the audacity to tell Parliament: Don’t believe the Hazaras, they’re lying. And now, at age 36, Safi has nominated himself to run for Parliament, under the Liberal Party banner, no less, in the seat of Division of Bruce in the state of Victoria, one of the most Hazara-populated electorates in Australia. This is a man who publicly delegitimizes your trauma, denies your history, and casts your community as dangerous and as a threat to Australia. And now, he wants to represent you? It's like "Hazaras! I hate you, but I need your vote." What the hell is this man thinking? What are we supposed to make of this? Is it hypocrisy? Opportunism? Deep-seated racism masked as political ambition? How does someone co-author a submission steeped in hatred and Hazara-phobia, and just three years later, ask for the votes of the very people he tried to harm? This is more than political irony. It’s a troubling contradiction, an oxymoronic dilemma that deserves answers. A man who has never seen what Afghanistan looks like, and is far removed from its reality, suddenly emerges to persecute Hazaras in the diaspora?

2) Tamkin Hakim

Tamkin Hakim, the sister of famous journalist and philanthropist Yalda Hakim, works as a mental health counselor with Allied Health Professionals. Following the withdrawal of U.S. troops and the subsequent collapse of Afghanistan into Taliban control, Hakim joined a coalition of volunteers that presumably rescued 200 Tajik women, according to her interview. While Yalda is widely recognized for her advocacy for girls’ education and her commitment to humanitarian causes, including the recent launch of a foundation offering scholarships to Afghanistani girls, her sister appears to stand in stark contrast.

Recently, a submission co-authored by Tamkin Hakim and five others was presented to the Australian Parliament. The document reportedly downplays the ongoing genocide of the Hazara people, distorts findings from reputable sources like Human Rights Watch, and troublingly frames the Hazara community as a national security threat to Australia. Such a stance is not only factually flawed but also deeply harmful and discriminatory.

Understandably, this raises serious concerns. How can two siblings, raised in the same environment, hold such opposing views, one championing human rights, and the other seemingly undermining them? While Yalda Hakim cannot be held accountable for her sister’s actions, in times of rising hate, public figures must take clear stands. Where does Yalda stand on this issue, especially when her sister’s statements contribute to the trauma of an already persecuted community?

The Hazara people have endured systematic persecution since the 1890s. In search of safety and the chance to rebuild their lives, many sought refuge in Australia, a country that promised protection and opportunity. They have worked tirelessly to establish a sense of belonging in their new home. Yet, the recent submission to Parliament echoes the same dangerous narratives that once endangered and persecuted them in Afghanistan, this time, disturbingly, from fellow Afghans who, despite having grown up outside the country, are now perpetuating the persecution of Hazaras in Australia.

It is deeply troubling that someone in a mental health profession, someone entrusted with the well-being of others, would contribute to rhetoric that marginalizes a vulnerable group. What kind of mental health support can be expected from someone who spreads such hateful views? And what experiences shaped Tamkin Hakim's perspective, leading her to harbor such hostility toward the Hazara community?

These are not easy questions, but they are essential. Especially when hate is given a platform in the name of national security, we must question its origins, challenge its narratives, and seek the truth.

3) Arezo Zoe Safi

Arezo Zoe Safi is a lawyer and the founder of Safi Law Firm in Sydney. It is said that she is a close relative of Zahid Safi, and both are presumably the niece and nephew of Mohammad Masoom Stanekzai, a prominent Afghan politician who formerly led the National Directorate of Security (NDS) and later served as the acting Minister of Defense. During his tenure as head of the NDS, Stanekzai has been accused of overseeing the suppression of the Enlightenment Movement protests of the Hazara people. Arezo was apparently born and raised in Australia and, like Zahid Safi and Tamkin Hakimi, has been far removed from the realities in Afghanistan. So, where does her hatred toward the Hazara people come from? How did it form? She maintains a significant presence on social media platforms. I encourage people to search her background, business, online presence, write a review, and contact her clients about her disturbing behavior.

4) Dr.  Sayed Mirwais Amin

Sayed Mirwais Amin (goes by Sayed Amin), received his MD from Kabul University, and has two MA degrees from La Trobe and Monash, respectively. He is based in Melbourne and runs a consulting company that receives donations in Australia and spends them in Afghanistan. He is in his 50s and appears to be socially shy and very religious but behind the scenes, he is a very active person in the Afghan community. He is currently working for DjirraVIC, a non-profit organization for the Aboriginal Community. How does he engage with Aboriginal community members in Australia, while at the same time promoting hatred against Indigenous Hazaras from Afghanistan, people who are now part of the very community he lives in? In addition to his professional role at a non-profit organization, he actively participates in a range of volunteer initiatives. Alongside nearly a dozen Afghan colleagues, he co-founded the Wardak Education and Developmental Organization (WEDO), which also engages in advocacy and lobbying efforts. On January 24, 2025, the group met with Evan Mulholland, Deputy Leader of the Liberal Party in the Legislative Council, to further their mission.

5) Naseer Shafaq

He is currently a Senior Technical Officer and Acting Team Leader at the Australian Taxation Office. For a while, he was jobless and went through vocational training and capacity building. He is an active member of his community and a pro-Pashtun ethnonationalist on both sides of the border. Note how he positions himself in his 2017 interview with Aliya Doctor. Before migrating to Australia, he worked as a coordination officer for UNAMA in Afghanistan and later at the British Consulate. While it's unclear exactly when he migrated, he recalls, “I began looking for jobs in early 2015, and made no progress in 18 months during which I applied for over 700 jobs and didn’t get a single interview.” He says that he had a well-paid position back in Afghanistan. Then, oddly, he adds: “I came to Australia on a skilled immigrant visa, not on a boat, but we’re all painted with the same brush.”

With this statement, he draws a sharp distinction between himself and Hazara asylum seekers who risked their lives fleeing atrocities, occasionally arriving in Australia by boat. Rather than expressing solidarity, he invokes a harmful stigma, distancing himself from those who are already marginalized. The phrase “on a boat” is loaded with racial and political connotations in the Australian context, and he seems to weaponize it as a marker of shame, hoping to elevate his own social standing by disassociating from others in his community. By emphasizing the "skilled" nature of his migration, despite lacking any verifiable higher education credentials or qualifications that would distinguish him from well-educated Australians, he performs a kind of class and racial exceptionalism. It’s in these subtle choices of language, “immigrant,” “on a boat,” that the reproduction of racism becomes visible.

6) Raz Mohammad Pirzoy

Australian Defense Force Former Interpreter - he worked as an interpreter with Australian troops in Afghanistan and was recently resettled with his family in Australia. He is currently a security officer at MSS Security and a gym maniac.
This individual has recently posted the following on his Facebook: “We stand by the accuracy and intent of our submission and remain committed to shedding light on the experiences of those affected by the events of that time.” This person blatantly spreads Hazaraphobia on Facebook with a whole crew of Safi families.

How do we combat racism in Australia?

One of the most effective ways is to hold individuals accountable, especially those actively spreading hate or misinformation.

• Start by researching these individuals:
• Where do they work?
• Do they own businesses?
• Are they active on social media?
• Are their businesses represented on social platforms?
• What kind of content or engagement are they involved in?

Once you have this information, take action:

• Contact the organizations that employ them. Reach out to Human Resources departments or senior leadership.
• Raise your concerns respectfully but firmly. Provide clear, concrete evidence of the individual’s behavior, whether it's discriminatory, harmful, or rooted in misinformation.
• Let them know you’re deeply concerned about this person representing their company or working while promoting hate.
• If the individual works in the public sector or a government organization, contact those agencies directly and ask for transparency and accountability.
• Share the background and context: explain how these individuals are not just expressing hateful views, they’re perpetuating persecution and discrimination against the Hazara community, bringing dangerous ideologies from abroad into Australian public life.

This isn’t about cancel culture. It’s about community safety, accountability, and standing up against racism, wherever it shows up.