He brought bombs on his people, now he opposes them

Well, Mr. Khalilzad! It's good to hear that you are against bombs. But during the 20 years of US occupation of Afghanistan, you supported the bombing of the southern regions. US forces, in just 2019, dropped roughly 7,423 bombs on Afghanistanis homes alone. Weren't you one of those who brought American bombers down on your own people? What happened that you suddenly became opposed to bombing? What's the difference between a Pakistani bomb and an American bomb? I haven't heard you criticize Americans for dropping bombs on Afghanistani homes.

Which one serves Pashtun interests and which one doesn't?

Which one, in your opinion, brings peace, and which one doesn't?

And more importantly, which one serves your interests? 

Throughout your memoir, you drone on about subservience and the sycophancy of the Republican leaders and warmonger generals. Once, a retired US official who served in Afghanistan and in the region told me: "Zal sycophantizes so much that I feel nauseous when I see him."

What happened that you are now opposed to bombs?

I am also opposed to bombs. Any kind of bomb. Whether dropped on Afghanistanis, on Palestinians in Gaza, Iran, or elsewhere. But I want to know why you suddenly became opposed to bombs. You were the one who sponsored the bombing of Afghanistan, especially the Pashtuns' homes?